abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Le contenu est également disponible dans les langues suivantes: English, 简体中文, 繁體中文

Affaire

Accelerated demand: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In July 2025, the Business & Human Rights Resource Centre published Accelerated demand: Human rights in Eastern Europe and Central Asia’s transition mineral boom – 2025 analysis that reveals an alarming rise in human rights and environmental abuses associated with the exploration, extraction, and processing of these minerals.

The report includes 270 publicly reported allegations of environmental and human rights abuses that took place in 2024 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 13 EECA countries.

In line with the Resource Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 13 companies to respond. Only Zijin, Mineco and ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih responded. Separately, JSC Aktyubinsk Chromium Compounds Plant reached out to comment on the allegations concerning its operations mentioned in the report. We were unable to invite the company earlier due to the lack of publicly available contact information. All responses and non-responses can be found below.

Réponses de l'entreprise

Zijin Mining Voir la réponse
Mineco International Limited Voir la réponse
Kazakhmys

Aucune réponse

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

Aucune réponse

PJSC United Mining and Chemical Company (UMCC Titanium)

Aucune réponse

Leningrad Alumina Plant LLC (part of RUSAL)

Aucune réponse

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

Aucune réponse

ArcelorMittal Kryvyi Rih Voir la réponse
Evraz

Aucune réponse

KAZ Minerals PLC

Aucune réponse

Georgian Manganese LLC

Aucune réponse

Arcore AG

Aucune réponse

Zangezur Copper Molybdenum Combine

Aucune réponse

JSC Aktobe chromium compounds plant Voir la réponse

Chronologie