abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Cette page n’est pas disponible en Français et est affichée en English

Article

16 mar 2026

Auteur:
Mining.com

UK: BHP wins ruling tied to claims it funded litigation aimed at preventing Brazilian municipalities from suing them in London over the Mariana dam collapse

"BHP wins UK appeal ending case over Brazil dam collapse claims", 16 March 2026

...BHP has won a UK Court of Appeal ruling that ends contempt of court proceedings tied to claims it funded litigation aimed at preventing Brazilian municipalities from suing the miner in London over the 2015 Mariana dam disaster.

The case centred on allegations by lawyers for hundreds of thousands of Brazilian claimants, including local governments and businesses. They said BHP backed legal action in Brazil through mining lobby group Ibram to block municipalities from joining lawsuits in the UK. The claimants argued the move interfered with the administration of justice and amounted to contempt of court.

BHP had previously failed to have the case dismissed, but the Court of Appeal overturned that earlier decision on Monday, bringing the contempt proceedings to an end. The world’s largest miner welcomed the ruling, while lawyers for the claimants said their focus remains on the broader litigation over the dam collapse...

Last week, BHP sought permission to appeal a High Court ruling that found it liable for the disaster following a trial that began in October and concluded in March. The Court of Appeal is expected to decide in the coming weeks whether the miner can challenge that liability finding.

A second trial to determine damages is scheduled to begin in October, with another phase expected in April 2027 to assess compensation owed to claimants...

Chronologie