abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

このページは 日本語 では利用できません。English で表示されています

コンテンツは以下の言語で利用可能です: English, 简体中文

ストーリー

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

企業への回答リクエスト

Kapan mining and processing company 回答を見る
Zijin Mining 回答を見る
Norilsk Nickel 回答を見る
Perzhanska Ore Company 回答を見る
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC 回答を見る
GeoProMining

回答無し

Yugo Metals

回答無し

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

回答無し

Georgian Manganese LLC 回答を見る
Kazakhmys

回答無し

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

回答無し

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

回答無し

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

回答無し

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

回答無し

Bapy Mining LLP

回答無し

Glencore 回答を見る
Kazchrome

回答無し

Mendia Resources LLC

回答無し

KAZ Minerals PLC

回答無し

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

回答無し

Kumtor Gold Company

回答無し

Minstroy Holding JSC

回答無し

JSC Russian Copper Company

回答無し

Evraz

回答無し

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

回答無し

Highland Gold

回答無し

Rosatom

回答無し

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

回答無し

United Company RUSAL

回答無し

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

回答無し

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

回答無し

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

回答無し

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) 回答を見る

タイムライン