abusesaffiliationarrow-downarrow-leftarrow-rightarrow-upattack-typeblueskyburgerchevron-downchevron-leftchevron-rightchevron-upClock iconclosedeletedevelopment-povertydiscriminationdollardownloademailenvironmentexternal-linkfacebookfilterflaggenderglobeglobegroupshealthC4067174-3DD9-4B9E-AD64-284FDAAE6338@1xinformation-outlineinformationinstagraminvestment-trade-globalisationissueslabourlanguagesShapeCombined Shapeline, chart, up, arrow, graphLinkedInlocationmap-pinminusnewsorganisationotheroverviewpluspreviewArtboard 185profilerefreshIconnewssearchsecurityPathStock downStock steadyStock uptagticktooltiptriangletwitteruniversalitywebwhatsappxIcons / Social / YouTube

Diese Seite ist nicht auf Deutsch verfügbar und wird angezeigt auf English

Der Inhalt ist auch in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar: English, 简体中文

Story

Workers paying the price: Companies respond to allegations linked to transition minerals in EECA region

In August 2026, the Business and Human Rights Centre published Workers paying the price: Hidden costs of transition minerals boom in Eastern Europe and Central Asia - 2026 analysis. The report reveals a continued pattern of human rights abuses and environmental damage caused by companies mining and processing transition minerals in EECA, highlighting the urgent need to implement the principles of a just energy transition - corporate duty of care for human rights, fair negotiations, and shared prosperity.

The analysis includes 373 publicly reported allegations of human rights and environmental abuses that took place in 2025 and are linked to mining project development, extraction and processing (smelting and refining) of 19 transition minerals in 14 EECA countries.

In line with the Centre’s strategy and libel policy, we made every effort to reach out to companies accused of abuse and invited them to respond to the allegations through our Company Response Mechanism, except in cases where the company had already issued a public statement, the abuse was the subject of legal or regulatory action, or the company had no website or contact information available.

We invited 32 companies to respond to the findings. Serbia Zijin Copper was invited separately to respond to the Krivelj village case study featured in the report. We were unable to invite two companies, Rudnik Antimona doo and Metal Gold LLC, due to a lack of publicly available contact information. Eight companies responded. All responses and non-responses are available below.

Unternehmensantworten

Kapan mining and processing company Antwort anzeigen
Zijin Mining Antwort anzeigen
Norilsk Nickel Antwort anzeigen
Perzhanska Ore Company Antwort anzeigen
Ulba Metallurgical Plant JSC Antwort anzeigen
GeoProMining

Keine Antwort

Yugo Metals

Keine Antwort

DPM Metals Inc (former Dundee Precious Metals)

Keine Antwort

Georgian Manganese LLC Antwort anzeigen
Kazakhmys

Keine Antwort

JSC Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant

Keine Antwort

Ust-Kamenogorsk Titanium and Magnesium Plant JSC

Keine Antwort

Temirtau Electrometallurgical Plant JSC

Keine Antwort

Qarmet (formerly ArcelorMittal Temirtau)

Keine Antwort

Bapy Mining LLP

Keine Antwort

Glencore Antwort anzeigen
Kazchrome

Keine Antwort

Mendia Resources LLC

Keine Antwort

KAZ Minerals PLC

Keine Antwort

Trepca mining and industrial processing complex

Keine Antwort

Kumtor Gold Company

Keine Antwort

Minstroy Holding JSC

Keine Antwort

JSC Russian Copper Company

Keine Antwort

Evraz

Keine Antwort

JSC Holding Company Metalloinvest

Keine Antwort

Highland Gold

Keine Antwort

Rosatom

Keine Antwort

Ural Mining and Metallurgical Company (UMMC)

Keine Antwort

United Company RUSAL

Keine Antwort

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex

Keine Antwort

Kryvyi Rih iron ore plant PJSC

Keine Antwort

Marhanets Mining & Processing Plant PJSC

Keine Antwort

Serbia Zijin Copper DOO (JV between Zijin Mining (63%) and Government of Serbia (37%)) Antwort anzeigen

Zeitleiste